>So there’s about 17 people running for president and the election is more than a year away.
Unfortunately, Labour Day (and summer) is now over so I guess I have to now pay attention to them since all these states are now getting in pissing contests over who can have the earliest primaries.*
* By the way, how stupid is it that primaries are spread over several months when the winners are effectively crowned by February? We’re a regionalist country, have the Northeast go one week, the Southeast the next, the Midwest afterwards, etc. Primaries would be finished in no time at all. And in addition, doesn’t it also bite that there is no longer any intrigue at the party conventions over who will get the nod?
Ok, rant over, because now I have to talk about Tom Tancredo, who is some fool from Colorado with the half-cocked notion that he can be president, and the even more delirious notion that he can do so as a Republican.
Tancredo’s main (public) beliefs appear to be the following:
- Dark people who don’t speak English are scary.
- Assault rifles and semi-automatics are A-OK!
- I can tell a woman what to do with her body.
- The government shouldn’t be involved in education (Tancredo served as the Department of Education’s regional rep in Denver, so really he’s kind of saying that he dropped the ball.)
And the most ludicrous one of them all (printed verbatim here):
“Federalism concerns make a constitutional amendment protecting traditional marriage an avenue of last resort, Unfortunately, intellectually dishonest activist judges have left us no choice. Activist courts have ignored the principal legal argument that the state’s interest in marriage is procreation. Population is power. Society needs a young generation to defend the country in battle, to support its programs with taxes and to carry on its culture and traditions. The mere fact that two people are in a loving relationship does not matter to the state. Society supports traditional marriage because it is the only union which, in the ordinary course, leads to children, without the intervention of a third party. “
That’s right, gay marriage should be banned because we need young people as cannon fodder and benefactors. The same man also says that the government spends too much and that we’re letting too many new people in.
No need to point out the historical parallels there, I reckon.
Verdict: Further evidence that the US is going to split up into various regions by the end of the century.