>the open skies agreement is meaningless without a push to force airlines to open up their slots at airports. ba, virgin, american and united will still dominate heathrow, for example. just because someone declares a feeding frenzy doesn’t mean we’ll be able to eat (as long as some very large pigs are already positioned in front of the trough). for this reason, i think we’ll see more alliances like the one proposed by aer lingus and united.
>the open skies agreement is meaningless without a push to force airlines to open up their slots at airports. ba, virgin, american and united will still dominate heathrow, for example. just because someone declares a feeding frenzy doesn’t mean we’ll be able to eat (as long as some very large pigs are already positioned in front of the trough). for this reason, i think we’ll see more alliances like the one proposed by aer lingus and united.
>the open skies agreement is meaningless without a push to force airlines to open up their slots at airports. ba, virgin, american and united will still dominate heathrow, for example. just because someone declares a feeding frenzy doesn’t mean we’ll be able to eat (as long as some very large pigs are already positioned in front of the trough). for this reason, i think we’ll see more alliances like the one proposed by aer lingus and united.
>the open skies agreement is meaningless without a push to force airlines to open up their slots at airports. ba, virgin, american and united will still dominate heathrow, for example. just because someone declares a feeding frenzy doesn’t mean we’ll be able to eat (as long as some very large pigs are already positioned in front of the trough). for this reason, i think we’ll see more alliances like the one proposed by aer lingus and united.